- New Book Announcements, Q2 2018 April 7, 2018
Hello everyone! We’ve been quiet for a little while because we’ve been working on new products, and didn’t want to make any announcements before we were confident we would be delivering what we announced 🙂 With that, let’s talk about NEW BOOKS … and more!
Home of Lost Hope
Home of Lost Hope is the first full adventure release for Forthright Open Roleplay! This adventure follows a group of investigators entering a creepy old house that shifts and changes around them. Once inside, they encounter an assortment of haunts and must make their way to the dark heart of the Home and destroy it if they hope to escape with their lives!
Fully illustrated in color by Arthur Asa, here are some sketches of the creepy images you can expect to see:
Coming in at 48 pages, Home of Lost Hope has new monsters, new Boosts, and new Traps for your Teams to encounter. Look for it in May at DriveThruRPG in both PDF ($7.99) and Print + PDF ($12.99), and at IndiePressRevolution in Print + PDF for $12.99!
Antagonists and Allies I: Demihumanity
We weren’t originally planning on creating any monster manuals, because we didn’t want Forthright to be a game about killing monsters. But our fans have spoken and we have listened, and we’re currently developing the first in our line of Antagonists and Allies books. These aren’t just monster manuals, though – they contain new Boosts, new rules, guidance on running enemies of the Team, new Factions, and complete historical and cultural writeups of every species making an appearance within the book. You will be able to identify what different Species would look like in fantasy, steampunk, dieselpunk, modern, postmodern, and futuristic settings, with specific rules on culture-altering events.
This first book will focus on classic demihumans – not just the fellowship races, but all the classic intelligent humanoids players might encounter in their adventures. We’ve also added some of our own, like the wasp-like Baqir and the cat-like Felidar. Over 40 different Species are making an appearance in Demihumanity. Look for it in the back half of 2018.
Guidebook I: Battlefield of the Mind
We were originally going to produce a single Guide-facing book, the Guidebook, to help Guides more easily incorporate their ideas into Forthright. As we reviewed the content, though, we realized that much of what we were going to collect in the Guidebook would be better served as articles here on Room209Gaming.com. If we’re going to ask for cash for something, than by gum it’s going to be something worth your money. So instead, we’re going to put that content up on this site for free and focus on specific genres for Guidebooks.
The first Guidebook, Battlefield of the Mind, covers a longtime favorite topic of Forthright co-designer Ray Watters: PSIONIC POWERS AND MIND CONTROL! Battlefield extends the core rules to cover Subversion, a unique mind-control method that allows players to experience a clash of wills against minds not their own. This book features new rules, new Boosts, new antagonists and allies, new factions, and new Gamescape ideas for your games! Look for it in the back half of 2018.
One of the things we’ve been weak on are videos or podcasts of actual play. We’ve been working on this since December, and I’m proud to say we’ve got some announcements on this front as well!
Later this month, I will be running an actual play of Home of Lost Hope for the Redacted Files podcast. We’re not sure when they’re going to be airing it (lots of factors there), but that’s something to look forward to! And a special thank you to Megan, Jonn, and the rest of the Redacted Files crew for having us 🙂
We’re also doing some work to create our own demos of actual play and put them on YouTube. We’re going to try and get those out in late spring / early summer, but this is a whole new sort of endeavor for us, so there may be delays.
Thank you so much for reading! We hope you’re as excited about these new developments as we are. Happy gaming!
- ERRATA: Attacking Outside Your Range March 10, 2018
When we first built Forthright, we wanted the different Fighting Stances to feel very different and support a particular kind of playstyle. The Deadeye, for example, was supposed to be far away or get far away early in a fight. The Juggernaut was intended to get up close and personal with the enemies. The Guardian could choose to be close to enemies or close to the allies he wanted to guard. The Whirlwind and Tactician were the most flexible, being able to attack in both Close and Long Ranges.
But a common question we’ve gotten is, “but what if my Deadeye wants to attack closer than 30 feet?” Or, “What if my Juggernaut picks up a gun? Why can’t he shoot it more than 30 feet away?”
The reason, and it’s a very gamey one, is that doing these things did not support the playstyles of the Fighting Stances. The idea there is that you either switch Fighting Stance to use the best Stance for your situation, or you get into a position where you can use the powers you’ve got. This is to help keep combat from becoming static contests of two people standing next to each other trading blows, which can get stale pretty quick.
But we overestimated the appeal of differentiated playstyles (or, alternately, underestimated the appeal of static combat). There are also situations where characters are trapped in a corner and it doesn’t feel fictionally appropriate for them to shoulder past their enemies and haul butt to fighting distance. So, for those situations where you need to attack outside the listed Range for your Fighting Style:
Your Fight Check is Dropped when attacking a target that is not within the listed Range of your Fighting Style and is not at Extreme Range.
What this means is that Deadeyes can attack targets in Close Range with a Dropped Check and Juggernauts and Guardians can attack targets in Long Range with a Dropped Check. Targets in Extreme Range still cannot be targeted for attacks with the default Fighting Styles, though tools or abilities may be crafted to allow this.
This isn’t a great option for these characters. It means they’ve got a 30% higher chance of doing no Harm and a 35% higher chance of being Exploited when attacking this way. But if their Fight Bonus is high enough, that’s not a terrible risk to take. Either way, it’s more options, and we here at Room 209 Gaming like options 🙂
- LESSONS LEARNED: NDAs Aren’t Worth It December 9, 2017
When we first started Room 209 Gaming, we tried to do everything by-the-book by following accountant and attorney advice. One of the things we were advised to establish was a Non-Disclosure Agreement for playtesters. This NDA was intended to protect our intellectual property and reputation, and would also ensure that if we discussed game rules or the like with playtesters, they could not come back later and claim they owned IP that was discussed during a playtest or retrospective. At the time, it made a lot of sense.
After the first session of public playtesting, way back in 2012, we had a playtester attempt to vacate the NDA. Ultimately the NDA stood, but it hit us directly in the wallet. Afterwards, we largely withdrew from public playtesting and went invite-only. Frankly, we couldn’t afford to have that happen again. I was personally so angry and disgusted that Room 209 Gaming almost ended before we’d published a single word.
It was all very frustrating and very dramatic, but it taught us one very important lesson that we maintain to this day: For a tabletop designer, unless you are working on a licensed property, an NDA is not worth the hassle.
Why do I say this? After all, I have an experience with an NDA situation in which Room 209 Gaming came out on top. Why would I advise anyone else to avoid them? Well:
- Copyright law only protects the specific expression of game rules, not the game rules themselves. So, for instance, if I have a mechanic I call the Midgard System that uses the middle of 3d10 to determine the value of a die roll, there is nothing in law that prevents anyone else from using the same mechanic and calling it the Mediocre Triad or something else. Your exact words are copyrightable, your engine isn’t.
- Even if someone takes your mechanics, they haven’t taken your game. First, the game-buying public in general frowns on design-thieving to that degree, and whoever does it will in short order find their reputation ruined. Second, the thing that makes your game unique is your specific expression of the rules. Even if someone else takes your mechanic, they can’t take the fundamental way of looking at it that only you possess.
- It takes work and money to transform any mechanic or idea into a functional, published game. The chances that someone will steal your idea, then also have the work ethic and cash to beat you to the punch in publishing that idea as a game, are virtually nil.
- It takes work and money to enforce an NDA. And that work and money are better spent on your part making your game rather than worrying after what other people are saying and doing. In our case, we could have bought 3-10 more pieces of art with the amount of money we spent on attorney’s fees.
- You’re specifically spending money and effort to get people to not talk about your game. Word-of-mouth is absolutely essential for building hype and community involvement. By trying to protect what’s virtually un-stealable, you’re shooting yourself in the foot by preventing your audience from growing.
Licensed properties are their own special thing. These usually have a brand or franchise manager, and they’re very careful about what gets out and about because they want to ensure the franchise grows and isn’t damaged by incomplete information. In these situations, it’s my understanding the brand owner will cover at least some if not all of the legal costs of the NDA (they are, after all, the ones demanding it). And when they’re handling the NDA, they can do whatever they want with it without expending the designer’s time and effort.
In the end, having the NDA did us no favors. It cost us extra money (four figures, for creating and enforcing it), it damaged goodwill between us and others, and the kicker is: nothing of that initial playtest session’s ruleset made it to the final game. It was entirely pointless.
So please, learn from our expensive lesson. If you’re considering an NDA, if you’re thinking someone might steal your game … let those anxieties go. They can’t steal the fundamental you-ness that will make your game what you imagine it to be, and there are way more cons than pros in creating an NDA. Save your money. Save your hairline. Design your game.
- Metatopia 2017 November 9, 2017
Hello and welcome! It’s been a few weeks since my last non-announcement post because we’ve been terrifically busy. Not only is Forthright Open Roleplay now available (and a silver seller!), but Sarah and I moved to a new house (and corporate office, I suppose) and I headed to New Jersey for the one-of-a-kind Metatopia. I didn’t bring anything of my own, because my goal this time was to give back to the community that made Forthright possible by playtesting as many other games as I could.
It’s taken me a while to sit down and write this because, alas, my flight back to RDU from Newark was cancelled due to clouds. Like, apparently, seriously terrifying clouds that shut down almost all traffic out of Newark this past Sunday night. So I had to cancel my flight and drive home…an 8-hour drive…starting at 8pm. I am not a young man anymore, that was hard.
Anyway, my brain seems to be fully-functioning again, so let’s talk Metatopia!
Metatopia is in a big way a networking convention, and this year I think I met and had wonderful conversations with more people than the previous two times I’d been to Metatopia. I think that’s mostly on me, as my previous visits were with Sarah and Ray and if I’ve got somebody I know I tend not to branch out to meet people I don’t. But I was also previously burdened with a severe case of impostor syndrome, like I didn’t really deserve to be there, and that anything I had to say was pointless and dumb compared to the gaming greats around me. Combined with a compulsion to stay entirely focused on the then-unfinished Forthright, I don’t think I was in a mind space to fully appreciate what Metatopia had to offer in this regard.
This time, I arrived with confidence – we had developed Forthright and gotten it to publication, and people in general liked it. That pushed impostor syndrome right out of my head – I had done something. And I got to hang out with a lot of great people and really enjoy myself as a result – and I thought about listing them all here, but that feels strangely like name-dropping oh look who I got to hang out with. So…next!
I only attended two panels this year, one of which I was on. From Idea to Product: Your First Game was a panel I was on with John Adamus and Laura Simpson. It was a really interesting experience to share advice with a room full of people, and hopefully the mistakes we’ve made will help some of those fine folks avoid making the same ones. And I got to meet Laura Simpson, who developed Companion’s Tale, a game I’d not heard of but am now dying to play!
Generic But Indie was a panel I attended at the urging of Jason Pitre and boy, am I glad I did! This panel had Jason, Brennan Taylor, and Hannah Shaffer talking about the difficulties of creating, marketing and sustaining a generic product with supplements. I’m really glad I went to this panel, because that was very much the original business plan for Room 209 Gaming: create Forthright, then do a bunch of game-setting products. We wanted to avoid the pushback Fantasy Flight experienced by repackaging the same rules over and over for Star Wars.
But, as it turns out, indie games tend not to suffer that pushback because they’re small enough that they offer additional growth opportunities rather than a burden. So that’s led to a shift in how we’ll be developing Gamescape products in the future.
The last time I attended Metatopia (2015), the con had grown to a point where there was friction between developers and players. Designers were expecting more robust feedback than they were getting, while players were expecting a more traditional con experience. I’m happy to say that this year, that did not seem to be the case – Double Exposure printed up packets for all the game tables that explained the roles and responsibilities of the devs and the players, and provided handouts with some great tools for structured feedback. I was pretty impressed.
And I got to play some really interesting games. “Take two stats and add numbers into a single die pool to roll” was a favorite mechanic this year, at least at the tables I gamed at. Some of the highlights (in alphabetical order):
- BLOCKBUSTER! was the last game I got to play, from Duffy Austin, and it was an absolute blast. You take on the roles of egomaniacal actors who are swinging a directionless movie production back and forth to give themselves spotlight. It only needed a couple of tweaks, and I can’t wait to play this game again.
- Harnessed by Ian Jarrard is ostensibly a sci-fi game where players powers stolen from an ancient cosmic evil to fight that same evil when it returns. In the state it was when I played it, it was still a fairly traditional game, with lots of things that it didn’t need because they weren’t what it was about. But Ian was very receptive to feedback, and this is the one game I can say I wrote that a mechanic was too damn fun, so why wasn’t the whole game revolving around that? Fortunately, Ian is going to be reworking it more into “Doctor Strange in Space,” which is kind of what it was, and I’m looking forward to the next iteration of the game.
- ISSUES! The Comic Book Continuity Building Game, from 9th Level Games, was a surprise for me because, while it was kind of a roleplaying game, it was also kind of a storytelling card game. The players got to take on different roles in a comic book company, building comics together based on card prompts. I think this is going to be a great party game when it’s done.
- Pasion de las Pasiones, from Stop, Hack and Roll, was not a playtest I participated in. But damn do I wish I had! This was in a lot of ways the star of the con – everyone I encountered who played it was talking about it, talking about it passionately, and talking about it positively. In it, you play both the characters in a telenovela and the family at home watching the show. It is designed to be raucous and hilarious, and the volume from the playtesting tables certainly attested that it’s doing its job!
- Project Violacea from Wrong Brothers Gaming (I love that name) is an interesting one. It’s marketed as a biopunk dystopic future about underrepresented demographics fighting against the controlling elites. I was fairly nervous about the quality of feedback I could give on this one, but overall the playtest turned out pretty well. It uses an interesting d100 mechanic with Fate-like aspects. This was an alpha test, but the mechanics are sound and I’m looking forward to seeing how they approach the world.
- Retrievers, from Saddle Shaped Games, had a very interesting tension mechanic that built and released tension over the course of a heist-style game. I’m interested to see where James Dagg goes with it.
- Save The Universe by Don Bisdorf is a PbtA-style game where the players are Guardians of the Galaxy-style heroes who are facing off against a galactic menace. This game was very polished and tremendous fun, but what really stood out for me was the rearranged die mechanic. Rather than 2d6+Bonus, higher better, Don has rearranged the difficulty curve, adding more entropy by making the face of the die matter based on your character’s strengths and what you’re attempting to do. Very impressive, I’m looking forward to playing more.
- Space Ice Hauler Heartbreak, from James Malloy, is about two lovers – the Lighthouse who stays behind and the Hauler who heads into space – changed by their long-distance relationship and the ravages of time dilation. While emotion-games aren’t usually a thing I go for, the potential in this game is tremendous. This was another alpha test, and even in this rough state I could see how beautiful it could be when it’s finished. Rob Donoghue as my Lighthouse telling me I need to stay away from caramel apple empanadas because the doctor says so was a highlight of the convention 🙂
Overall, Metatopia 2017 was another successful convention from Double Exposure and a great opportunity to play some great new games in their infancy. I hope I was helpful! And now, if you’ll excuse me, I’ve got to go get a caramel apple empanada XD